We Believe
I've become a student of culture. Not necessarily of the diversity of cultures, but really the idea of micro-cultures. And I wonder if Postmodernism has uncovered (rather than created) that truth seems to take a different form depending on what culture you are in.
My friend Lance Finley has recently had the opportunity to attend some major black denominational meetings. At one recent one, before the Presidential election, John Kerry spoke. Lance said it was really weird because little old black ladies were talking about Kerry like little old white ladies talk about Bush. The "truth" was dependent on the culture.
We tend to think our beliefs about God and the Bible are beyond culture. They are not. PD (as Dan would like to be known) said that the inerrency and incorruptibility of the Bible are their number one core value. Phil noted that he struggles with some people's desire to use the KJV. Those are issues of culture. I don't live in either of those cultures. The Bible for me is a witness to the journey from creation to consummation. It is an honest reflection of the struggles of God and humanity to make an intimate connection that brings wholeness to our lives. It was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic and our translations are a matter of cultural interpretation.
It is a guide to life but interestingly says little about things like marriage and then in fact gives us hardly any positive examples of marriages. It has some wisdom about money but then Jesus says to one man to give all his money to the poor in order to be saved. It is a wild note that Jesus himself says to one man that he must be born again, but to another man that he must give away all his money, and yet to another that salvation will depend on one's willingness to meet the needs of the least of people (Matthew 25).
I was talking with a man this morning as I was doing premarital counseling. I asked him about God and he told me. I asked him where Jesus fit in and he said, "Oh, we're going to talk about doctrine." I hope not. I hope Jesus isn't doctrine to us. He is the living King of the Universe for me, who speaks and asks me to follow rather than to believe. My sorrow for my sins is only crucial as it makes me turn from it and follow Him as He moves through my home, my church, my community, and the world.
The United States (let alone the world) is full of micro-cultures where the "truth" has to find itself true to that culture. How do we write a "We Believe" book that is useful as a tool in that context?
6 Comments:
When my husband and I were in an anthropology class, we were given a little quiz--the goal was to help us discover how intertwined our beliefs (about Christianity) and culture were.
While I don't have a copy of it anymore, we had to rate 15-20 statements, from basics like "Jesus is the Son of God" to more controversial or doctrinal issues like "Polygamy should never be practiced by Christians." (Still an issue for churches in parts of the world.)
The highest rating we could give a statement was "I would die for this."
When you think about the things we're willing to argue about ad infinitum, I wonder how many of them we'd be willing to give our life for.
Sherri
Sherri, good point there.
Brian, I would have to say that I agree with your view of the Bible and the place it has in a person's life. I also understand your point about our core value being a reaction to a culture issue within the protestant church.
But beyond that, the essence is that ultimate or absolute truth is out there. And it can be found in the source of the Bible.
I read this quote from Tozer this morning:
God will not hold us responsible to understand the
mysteries of election, predestination, and the divine
sovereignty. The best and safest way to deal with these truths
is to raise our eyes to God and in deepest reverence say, "O
Lord, Thou knowest." Those things belong to the deep and
mysterious Profound of God's omniscience. Prying into them may
make theologians, but it will never make saints.
... A. W. Tozer (1897-1963), The Pursuit of God
While at first glance this makes me think, "cool, I don't have to worry about it;" Doesn't even a statement like that pack a lot of theology, or "truths about God and the Bible"?
Then I ran across this:
Their (church leaders) core mission is to effect change in people's lives. This is accomplished through two primary means; the creative application of biblical truth and the intentional development of a community that embodies Kingdom values. (from:connectionpower.com)
So, isn't it about seeking to find how the truth of God fits into our culture/community, and even discovering it through the lense of our community?
But I don't know how narrow you can define community/culture in that sense. Are we not all tied to God in some way; and doesn't the truth of God transcend our different cultures? So can't we agree on "truths", but maybe not how they apply in each culture?
I believe in absolute truth, but that doesn't mean I know truth absolutely. But that doesn't mean I shouldn't be seeking to know it.
Thanks for the great conversation, but I think I have a headache.
Brian,
You say, "The Bible for me is a witness to the journey from creation to consummation."
Do you mean to say that it is not REVELATION from God? Are you suggesting that it is only a human testimony of the human struggle to live in relationship with God?
I don't think I answered Bill's question in my other comment. The Bible is filled with the stories that God has revealed should guide us. It is not just a collection of stories about God. God has directed us toward these stories. It wasn't done as I guess I was led to believe. But the early churches all began to individually use the same stories. The revealed stories rose to the top of the useful list.
Brian,
Here's another of your statements that provoked thought in me:
"I hope Jesus isn't doctrine to us. He is the living King of the Universe for me, who speaks and asks me to follow rather than to believe."
Preach it, bro?
Jesus should never be doctrine. He is God incarnate. And, He is more than merely God in the flesh. I believe Him in His claim: "I AM the way and the truth and the life." He didn't teach those things. He didn't show those things. He IS those things. And, they are He.
Regarding your distinction between believing and following: I think that distinction is western and modern. Jesus, as He is presented in John--the Gospel of Belief--says, "If you love me, obey my commandments." And, "Those who obey my commandments are the ones who love me." (NLT)
The distinction between following and believing is artificial. It's our own invention. Or, perhaps I should say, perversion.
Post a Comment
<< Home